
Has Jesus Returned?, Part 7
The teaching asserts Jesus' judgment came in AD 70 with Jerusalem's fall, fulfilling prophecy. It challenges Trinitarian views, emphasizes vigilance, and suggests Jesus' return was imminent, not distant.
The teaching asserts Jesus' judgment came in AD 70 with Jerusalem's fall, fulfilling prophecy. It challenges Trinitarian views, emphasizes vigilance, and suggests Jesus' return was imminent, not distant.
Moses chose faith over privilege, aligning with his Hebrew roots, prioritizing spiritual rewards over earthly pleasures, and leading the Israelites by divine guidance.
Shawn's teaching suggests hell is not eternal but a refining process, emphasizing God's love, justice, and free will, aligning with universal reconciliation themes.
Shawn McCraney critiques LDS teachings on the Gospel's global spread before Christ's return, emphasizing historical context of "last days" as Jesus' era, not ongoing.
Joseph's faith in burial plans, Moses' faith-driven choices, Israelites' growth under oppression, Moses' dual upbringing, civil disobedience, parallels with Jesus.
Shawn's "total reconciliationism" posits God's plan to reconcile all, differing from Universalism, Calvinism, and Arminianism. It distinguishes hell from the Lake of Fire, critiques eternal punishment translations, and suggests finite posthumous judgment, emphasizing eventual reconciliation through Christ.
Shawn McCraney teaches a biblical Christianity focused on spiritual fulfillment over material success, interpreting Matthew 24 as historical, not futuristic, emphasizing personal readiness.
Hebrews 11 highlights faith through biblical figures like Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph. Key themes: faith, blessings, deceit, inheritance, transformation.
Shawn's teaching explores Jesus' statement in John 12:32, balancing God's omniscience, omnipotence, and human free will, critiquing Calvinism, and rejecting Open Theism.
Shawn McCraney critiques traditional and non-denominational churches for ritual emphasis and social focus, respectively. He links historical events to biblical prophecy, questioning grand structures and urging simpler faith. He interprets Jesus' return metaphorically, connecting Roman actions to divine judgment, and encourages deeper engagement with his teachings.