Comparative Teachings

Comparative Teachings: Deconstructing Organized Religion

Understanding Comparative Teachings

Christianity, as practiced today, is a complex system of doctrines, traditions, and institutions that have evolved over centuries. Many believers assume that these structures accurately represent what Christ taught, but a closer examination of scripture and history reveals that much of organized religion is built on man-made traditions rather than fulfilled truth.

The Great News Network provides an in-depth exploration of how fulfilled theology differs from mainstream Christian doctrines and how deconstructing organized religion allows for a more authentic, Christ-centered faith. This is not about attacking religious institutions—it’s about uncovering what remains when we strip away centuries of dogma, tradition, and control.

Why Deconstruct Organized Religion?

The Christian experience for many is shaped by denominational teachings, hierarchical leadership, and institutionalized belief systems. While these structures may offer community and guidance, they often lead to:

Rigid theological systems that demand conformity rather than personal faith.
Fear-based teachings that tie salvation to institutional allegiance.
A loss of personal spiritual autonomy, making faith about submission to human authority rather than personal conviction.
A disconnect between Christ’s message of freedom and the legalistic burdens imposed by churches.

Through comparative teachings, we examine these issues and provide an alternative: a faith lived in personal conviction, love, and truth, rather than one dictated by religious institutions.

Key Topics in Comparative Teachings

Below is an overview of our comparative theological studies that explore how traditional Christian teachings contrast with the fulfilled perspective.

1. Modern Christian Doctrines vs. Fulfilled Theology

A comprehensive look at major doctrinal differences between traditional Christianity and fulfilled theology.

2. Calvinism vs. The Great News

Calvinist theology presents a predetermined view of salvation, grace, and human will. This section contrasts Calvinist beliefs with fulfilled theology, addressing:

3. Evangelicalism vs. Subjective Christianity

Evangelical Christianity is known for its strict doctrinal positions, inerrant view of scripture, and institutional authority.

4. Issues with Christian Culture

Beyond theology, modern Christian culture has adopted material, political, and social identities that are far removed from Christ’s original teachings.

5. Understanding Mormonism

Mormonism presents a unique set of theological claims, additional scriptures, and an institutional hierarchy that differ from fulfilled theology.

6. Being a Christian vs. Being a Yeshuan

The term Christian is heavily loaded with cultural, political, and institutional baggage that has shaped its meaning over time. Many who follow Christ today struggle with the label because it carries assumptions about doctrine, behavior, and affiliation with churches or denominations. What about the term that The Great News presents, a “Yeshuan”?

The Goal of Comparative Teachings

We do not engage in these studies to attack or dismantle faith but to encourage believers to think critically about what they believe, why they believe it, and whether it aligns with the fulfilled work of Christ. Deconstructing organized religion allows individuals to:

Embrace faith without institutional control.
Recognize where religious systems have added unnecessary burdens.
Find freedom in faith that is rooted in Christ rather than church membership.
Live out faith based on love, truth, and conviction rather than rules and fear.

Next Steps

Want to dive deeper? Click on any of the subtopics above to explore comparative teachings in more detail.